Feature Comparison

Orq.ai vs Langfuse vs LangSmith

Orq.ai covers the full AI lifecycle in one platform—build, test, ship, and monitor GenAI from prototype to production. Langfuse and Langsmith handle only observability and evaluation.

Feature Comparison

Orq.ai vs Langfuse vs LangSmith

Orq.ai covers the full AI lifecycle in one platform—build, test, ship, and monitor GenAI from prototype to production. Langfuse and Langsmith handle only observability and evaluation.

Feature Comparison

Orq.ai vs Langfuse vs LangSmith

Orq.ai covers the full AI lifecycle in one platform—build, test, ship, and monitor GenAI from prototype to production. Langfuse and Langsmith handle only observability and evaluation.

Feature Comparison

Orq.ai vs Langfuse vs LangSmith

Orq.ai covers the full AI lifecycle in one platform—build, test, ship, and monitor GenAI from prototype to production. Langfuse and Langsmith handle only observability and evaluation.

AI Gateway

AI Gateway

AI Gateway

Unified API

Unified API

Model garden

Model garden

Multimodality

Multimodality

Bring your own models

Bring your own models

Retries & fallbacks

Retries & fallbacks

OpenAI compatibility

OpenAI compatibility

3rd party library integrations

3rd party library integrations

Deployment

Deployment

Deployment

Contextual routing

Contextual routing

File handling

File handling

Session management

Session management

Canary releases

Canary releases

Online evaluators

Online evaluators

Online guardrails

Online guardrails

Version control

Version control

Prompt guards

Prompt guards

Webhooks

Webhooks

LLM Caching

LLM Caching

RAG

RAG

RAG

Knowledge bases

Knowledge bases

Knowledge bases API

Knowledge bases API

Knowledge bases API

File handling

File handling

Agentic RAG

Agentic RAG

Chunking strategies

Chunking strategies

Chunking API

Chunking API

Knowledge editor

Knowledge editor

Embedding

Embedding

Reranking

Reranking

Retrieval strategy

Retrieval strategy

RAG evaluators

RAG evaluators

RAG experiments

RAG experiments

Citations

Citations

Experimentation

Experimentation

Experimentation

Playgrounds

Playgrounds

RAG in playground

RAG in playground

Prompt comparisons

Prompt comparisons

LLM comparisons

LLM comparisons

Historical run management

Historical run management

Historical run management

Dataset manager

Dataset manager

Offline evaluators

Offline evaluators

CI/CD support

CI/CD support

Prompt Engineering

Prompt Engineering

Prompt Engineering

Version control

Version control

Prompt library

Prompt library

Structured output

Structured output

Few-shot prompting

Few-shot prompting

Prompt snippets

Prompt snippets

Prompt optimization

Prompt optimization

Prompt API

Prompt API

Evaluation

Evaluation

Evaluation

LLM-as-a-judge evaluators

LLM-as-a-judge evaluators

LLM-as-a-judge evaluators

HTTP evaluators

HTTP evaluators

Python evaluators

Python evaluators

Programmatic evaluators

Programmatic evaluators

Programmatic evaluators

RAGAS evaluators

RAGAS evaluators

Human annotations

Human annotations

Multi-turn evaluation frameworks

Multi-turn evaluation frameworks

Evaluators API

Evaluators API

Observability

Observability

Observability

Traces

Traces

Sessions

Sessions

User & entity tracking

User & entity tracking

User & entity tracking

Token & cost tracking

Token & cost tracking

Token & cost tracking

Golden dataset curation

Golden dataset curation

Meta-data enrichment

Meta-data enrichment

Citations

Citations

Agents

Agents

Agents

Agentic workflows

Agentic workflows

Agentic experimentation

Agentic experimentation

Agentic experimentation

Agent tracing

Agent tracing

Agentic deployments

Agentic deployments

Agentic evaluators

Agentic evaluators

Agentic datasets

Agentic datasets

Compatibility with 3rd-party frameworks

Compatibility with 3rd-party frameworks

Compatibility with 3rd-party frameworks

Tool calls

Tool calls

Agents API

Agents API

MCP

MCP

A2A compatible

A2A compatible

Security & Privacy

Security & Privacy

Security & Privacy

Role-based access control

Role-based access control

Role-based access control

SOC2 Type 2 certification

SOC2 Type 2 certification

SOC2 Type 2 certification

GDPR compliance

GDPR compliance

PII management

PII management

Enterprise authentication

Enterprise authentication

Data residency management

Data residency management

Infrastructure

Infrastructure

Infrastructure

AWS Marketplace

AWS Marketplace

Azure Marketplace

Azure Marketplace

On-prem deployment

On-prem deployment

Incidence management

Incidence management

Orq.ai

Orq.ai

Orq.ai

Langfuse

Langfuse

Langfuse

Langsmith

Langsmith

Langsmith

Future-proof solution

Why teams switch

Future-proof solution

Why teams switch

Future-proof solution

Why teams switch

Future-proof solution

Why teams switch

One control tower across teams

Unite engineering, product, and data teams in one place. Shared truth, role-based workflows, and human-in-the-loop feedback that drives continuous improvement.

One control tower across teams

Unite engineering, product, and data teams in one place. Shared truth, role-based workflows, and human-in-the-loop feedback that drives continuous improvement.

One control tower across teams

Unite engineering, product, and data teams in one place. Shared truth, role-based workflows, and human-in-the-loop feedback that drives continuous improvement.

One control tower across teams

Unite engineering, product, and data teams in one place. Shared truth, role-based workflows, and human-in-the-loop feedback that drives continuous improvement.

Deploy anywhere, safely

Our cloud, your cloud, or your servers. Private connections supported. Roll out safely and roll back fast.

Deploy anywhere, safely

Our cloud, your cloud, or your servers. Private connections supported. Roll out safely and roll back fast.

Deploy anywhere, safely

Our cloud, your cloud, or your servers. Private connections supported. Roll out safely and roll back fast.

Deploy anywhere, safely

Our cloud, your cloud, or your servers. Private connections supported. Roll out safely and roll back fast.

Compliant, secure and flexible

SOC 2-certified, GDPR-compliant, and aligned with the EU AI Act. Manage risk responsibly with EU or US data residency and regional storage and processing across open and closed ecosystems.

Compliant, secure and flexible

SOC 2-certified, GDPR-compliant, and aligned with the EU AI Act. Manage risk responsibly with EU or US data residency and regional storage and processing across open and closed ecosystems.

Compliant, secure and flexible

SOC 2-certified, GDPR-compliant, and aligned with the EU AI Act. Manage risk responsibly with EU or US data residency and regional storage and processing across open and closed ecosystems.

Compliant, secure and flexible

SOC 2-certified, GDPR-compliant, and aligned with the EU AI Act. Manage risk responsibly with EU or US data residency and regional storage and processing across open and closed ecosystems.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Langfuse and Langsmith?

Langfuse and LangSmith are both platforms built to support teams developing LLM-powered applications, but they differ in their origins and focus. Langfuse started as an open-source observability tool, focusing on tracing, logging, and evaluating LLM application performance. LangSmith, built by the creators of LangChain, is more tightly integrated with the LangChain ecosystem and also focuses on observability and evaluation, with additional tooling for prompt and chain management. Both are evolving to support more of the LLM application lifecycle, but observability remains their core strength.

Is Langfuse or Langsmith open source?

Langfuse is available as an open-source project, which makes it appealing for teams that want flexibility and control over their infrastructure. It also offers a managed cloud version for ease of deployment. Langsmith, on the other hand, is a closed-source platform developed by the creators of LangChain and is closely tied to the LangChain ecosystem. For teams that prioritize open tooling, Langfuse may be a better fit. For those looking for a vendor-managed solution with broader lifecycle coverage and cross-platform compatibility, including observability, Orq.ai offers a fully managed platform designed to integrate with a variety of LLM frameworks and workflows.

Can Langfuse or Langsmith handle more than observability?

Yes, both Langfuse and Langsmith are expanding their capabilities beyond observability. Langfuse is introducing features for feedback collection, versioning, and some deployment workflows. Langsmith offers prompt versioning, dataset management, and limited tooling for testing and evaluation workflows. However, neither platform currently offers full support for the end-to-end development lifecycle of LLM applications, such as collaborative design environments, agent orchestration, or production-grade deployment workflows.

Are Langfuse and Langsmith suitable for non-technical users?

Langfuse and Langsmith are primarily built for developers and technical users. Both platforms require familiarity with LLM development, prompt engineering, and application monitoring. Non-technical users may find the interfaces and workflows less accessible without engineering support. For teams looking to include product managers, domain experts, or other non-developers in their GenAI workflows, a platform like Orq.ai may be more suitable.

How does Orq.ai compare to Langfuse and Langsmith?

Orq.ai differs by offering an end-to-end platform purpose-built for the full LLMOps lifecycle. While Langfuse and Langsmith focus primarily on observability and evaluation, Orq.ai includes capabilities for design, deployment, monitoring, and optimization of agentic AI systems. It also provides a collaborative interface that supports both technical and non-technical team members, helping GenAI teams move from prototype to production with greater speed and clarity.

What is the difference between Langfuse and Langsmith?

Langfuse and LangSmith are both platforms built to support teams developing LLM-powered applications, but they differ in their origins and focus. Langfuse started as an open-source observability tool, focusing on tracing, logging, and evaluating LLM application performance. LangSmith, built by the creators of LangChain, is more tightly integrated with the LangChain ecosystem and also focuses on observability and evaluation, with additional tooling for prompt and chain management. Both are evolving to support more of the LLM application lifecycle, but observability remains their core strength.

Is Langfuse or Langsmith open source?

Langfuse is available as an open-source project, which makes it appealing for teams that want flexibility and control over their infrastructure. It also offers a managed cloud version for ease of deployment. Langsmith, on the other hand, is a closed-source platform developed by the creators of LangChain and is closely tied to the LangChain ecosystem. For teams that prioritize open tooling, Langfuse may be a better fit. For those looking for a vendor-managed solution with broader lifecycle coverage and cross-platform compatibility, including observability, Orq.ai offers a fully managed platform designed to integrate with a variety of LLM frameworks and workflows.

Can Langfuse or Langsmith handle more than observability?

Yes, both Langfuse and Langsmith are expanding their capabilities beyond observability. Langfuse is introducing features for feedback collection, versioning, and some deployment workflows. Langsmith offers prompt versioning, dataset management, and limited tooling for testing and evaluation workflows. However, neither platform currently offers full support for the end-to-end development lifecycle of LLM applications, such as collaborative design environments, agent orchestration, or production-grade deployment workflows.

Are Langfuse and Langsmith suitable for non-technical users?

Langfuse and Langsmith are primarily built for developers and technical users. Both platforms require familiarity with LLM development, prompt engineering, and application monitoring. Non-technical users may find the interfaces and workflows less accessible without engineering support. For teams looking to include product managers, domain experts, or other non-developers in their GenAI workflows, a platform like Orq.ai may be more suitable.

How does Orq.ai compare to Langfuse and Langsmith?

Orq.ai differs by offering an end-to-end platform purpose-built for the full LLMOps lifecycle. While Langfuse and Langsmith focus primarily on observability and evaluation, Orq.ai includes capabilities for design, deployment, monitoring, and optimization of agentic AI systems. It also provides a collaborative interface that supports both technical and non-technical team members, helping GenAI teams move from prototype to production with greater speed and clarity.

What is the difference between Langfuse and Langsmith?

Langfuse and LangSmith are both platforms built to support teams developing LLM-powered applications, but they differ in their origins and focus. Langfuse started as an open-source observability tool, focusing on tracing, logging, and evaluating LLM application performance. LangSmith, built by the creators of LangChain, is more tightly integrated with the LangChain ecosystem and also focuses on observability and evaluation, with additional tooling for prompt and chain management. Both are evolving to support more of the LLM application lifecycle, but observability remains their core strength.

Is Langfuse or Langsmith open source?

Langfuse is available as an open-source project, which makes it appealing for teams that want flexibility and control over their infrastructure. It also offers a managed cloud version for ease of deployment. Langsmith, on the other hand, is a closed-source platform developed by the creators of LangChain and is closely tied to the LangChain ecosystem. For teams that prioritize open tooling, Langfuse may be a better fit. For those looking for a vendor-managed solution with broader lifecycle coverage and cross-platform compatibility, including observability, Orq.ai offers a fully managed platform designed to integrate with a variety of LLM frameworks and workflows.

Can Langfuse or Langsmith handle more than observability?

Yes, both Langfuse and Langsmith are expanding their capabilities beyond observability. Langfuse is introducing features for feedback collection, versioning, and some deployment workflows. Langsmith offers prompt versioning, dataset management, and limited tooling for testing and evaluation workflows. However, neither platform currently offers full support for the end-to-end development lifecycle of LLM applications, such as collaborative design environments, agent orchestration, or production-grade deployment workflows.

Are Langfuse and Langsmith suitable for non-technical users?

Langfuse and Langsmith are primarily built for developers and technical users. Both platforms require familiarity with LLM development, prompt engineering, and application monitoring. Non-technical users may find the interfaces and workflows less accessible without engineering support. For teams looking to include product managers, domain experts, or other non-developers in their GenAI workflows, a platform like Orq.ai may be more suitable.

How does Orq.ai compare to Langfuse and Langsmith?

Orq.ai differs by offering an end-to-end platform purpose-built for the full LLMOps lifecycle. While Langfuse and Langsmith focus primarily on observability and evaluation, Orq.ai includes capabilities for design, deployment, monitoring, and optimization of agentic AI systems. It also provides a collaborative interface that supports both technical and non-technical team members, helping GenAI teams move from prototype to production with greater speed and clarity.

What is the difference between Langfuse and Langsmith?

Langfuse and LangSmith are both platforms built to support teams developing LLM-powered applications, but they differ in their origins and focus. Langfuse started as an open-source observability tool, focusing on tracing, logging, and evaluating LLM application performance. LangSmith, built by the creators of LangChain, is more tightly integrated with the LangChain ecosystem and also focuses on observability and evaluation, with additional tooling for prompt and chain management. Both are evolving to support more of the LLM application lifecycle, but observability remains their core strength.

Is Langfuse or Langsmith open source?

Langfuse is available as an open-source project, which makes it appealing for teams that want flexibility and control over their infrastructure. It also offers a managed cloud version for ease of deployment. Langsmith, on the other hand, is a closed-source platform developed by the creators of LangChain and is closely tied to the LangChain ecosystem. For teams that prioritize open tooling, Langfuse may be a better fit. For those looking for a vendor-managed solution with broader lifecycle coverage and cross-platform compatibility, including observability, Orq.ai offers a fully managed platform designed to integrate with a variety of LLM frameworks and workflows.

Can Langfuse or Langsmith handle more than observability?

Yes, both Langfuse and Langsmith are expanding their capabilities beyond observability. Langfuse is introducing features for feedback collection, versioning, and some deployment workflows. Langsmith offers prompt versioning, dataset management, and limited tooling for testing and evaluation workflows. However, neither platform currently offers full support for the end-to-end development lifecycle of LLM applications, such as collaborative design environments, agent orchestration, or production-grade deployment workflows.

Are Langfuse and Langsmith suitable for non-technical users?

Langfuse and Langsmith are primarily built for developers and technical users. Both platforms require familiarity with LLM development, prompt engineering, and application monitoring. Non-technical users may find the interfaces and workflows less accessible without engineering support. For teams looking to include product managers, domain experts, or other non-developers in their GenAI workflows, a platform like Orq.ai may be more suitable.

How does Orq.ai compare to Langfuse and Langsmith?

Orq.ai differs by offering an end-to-end platform purpose-built for the full LLMOps lifecycle. While Langfuse and Langsmith focus primarily on observability and evaluation, Orq.ai includes capabilities for design, deployment, monitoring, and optimization of agentic AI systems. It also provides a collaborative interface that supports both technical and non-technical team members, helping GenAI teams move from prototype to production with greater speed and clarity.

Create an account and start building today.

Create an account and start building today.

Create an account and start building today.

Create an account and start building today.